Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Moto G41, having a score of 98.9 against 79.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Moto G41 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is just a little thinner than Moto G41, but it's somewhat heavier and was released about a year before.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G41, because it has a little higher screen density, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Moto G41 features a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G41 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G41, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a much better video resolution.
Motorola Moto G41 counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.