Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-28 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than Moto G41's 79.1 score. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Moto G41 has Android 11 version, offering a couple nice extra features. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is older, just a little thicker and heavier than Moto G41.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G41, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen.
Moto G41 has slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G41 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G41, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery life that's just as good as the Moto G41 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.