Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G41's 79.1 score. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Motorola Moto G41 has Android 11 version, so it gives you some extra features and performance tweaks. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older and a little heavier than Motorola Moto G41, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better looking display than Moto G41, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a quite larger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto G41 counts with a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G41 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G41 also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto G41 counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.