Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-28 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G41, having a 92.3 score against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is thinner than the Motorola Moto G41, although it's just a bit heavier and was released just a little more than a year before. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G41, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Moto G41 counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G41 features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G41 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G41 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.