Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2017-03-31 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Moto G5 Plus's score of 74.6. Even though Apple iPhone X and Moto G5 Plus were released with only a couple months difference, the Apple iPhone X design is way thinner but also somewhat heavier than Moto G5 Plus. The iPhone X counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a just a little greater display pixels density, a little bigger screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution.
The iPhone X features a quite superior performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone X features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture and a smaller sensor, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone X also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Apple iPhone X has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Moto G5 Plus has just a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G5 Plus. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G5 Plus, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.