Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-03-31 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Moto G5 Plus, getting a global score of 81.9 against 74.6. The Google Pixel 4 design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Moto G5 Plus. Google Pixel 4 features a bit superior processor than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better looking display than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a little bit larger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite higher display density. The Motorola Moto G5 Plus has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G5 Plus also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB.
Google Pixel 4 captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a more mega pixels camera.
The Moto G5 Plus features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4 is a lot more expensive than Moto G5 Plus, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.