Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-03-31 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus's overall score of 74.6. The LG V30S ThinQ design is newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto G5 Plus's, although it's also a little bit heavier. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a higher display density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a larger display.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The LG V30S ThinQ shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G5 Plus. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G5 Plus, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.