Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-03-31 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Moto G5 Plus's global score of 74.6. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer and much thinner cellphone than Moto G5 Plus, although it's also just a little bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a higher pixel number in each inch in the display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a larger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit longer battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a lot better 16 MP resolution back-facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Moto G5 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.