Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, having an 81.2 score against 74.6. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is newer and notably thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G5 Plus. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a greater pixel density, a larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V40 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. LG V40 ThinQ takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution camera, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with faster video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.