Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than Moto G5 Plus, with a score of 80.3 against 74.6. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is newer and just a little thinner than Moto G5 Plus's, although it's also extremely heavier. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G5 Plus has a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a bit better pixel count in each inch of screen. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, better 60 fps video frame rates and a camera with way more megapixels.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.