Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is slightly better than the Moto G5 Plus's 74.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but extremely heavier than Moto G5 Plus. The Moto G5 Plus counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A35 5G features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery life than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.