Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-03-31 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Moto G5 Plus's 74.6 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the Moto G5 Plus. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little better processing power than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G5 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A52 both feature quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A52 features a very superior camera than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.