Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Moto G5 Plus, having a 91.3 score against 74.6. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is somewhat heavier than Moto G5 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and a lot newer. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a display that's just as good as Motorola Moto G5 Plus's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display.
Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much better battery performance than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.