Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus's score of 74.6. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is much newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Moto G5 Plus. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a screen that is just as good as the display in Moto G5 Plus, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better photos and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G5 Plus, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.