Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-31 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, with a score of 97.6 against 74.6. The Galaxy Fold design is noticeably newer and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus's, although it's also a lot heavier. The Motorola Moto G5 Plus counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little better processing power than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Fold features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video definition and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Fold also counts with better video frame rate and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 46% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.