Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus's general score of 74.6. Galaxy Note 20 is a newer and somewhat thinner device than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but it's also way heavier. Motorola Moto G5 Plus and Galaxy Note 20 have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better processing power than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better video definition and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a much better battery lifetime than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G5 Plus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G5 Plus, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.