Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto G5 Plus's global score of 74.6. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto G5 Plus's, although it is also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a lot larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage to install applications and games than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.