Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus's 74.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's design is somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but it is just a bit heavier and was released 4 years before. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has less RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little more vivid screen than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a better 13 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G5 Plus features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G5 Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 128 GB. Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better battery life than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 is more expensive than the Moto G5 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.