Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-03-31 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus's 74.6 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a screen that's just as good as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better processing unit than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have a camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
Galaxy Note10 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Note10 features a bit better battery performance than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G5 Plus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.