Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus's global score of 74.6. Although the Galaxy Note10 Lite is extremely heavier than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, it's thinner and noticeably newer. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a display that's very similar to the display in Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little better hardware performance than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 Lite takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with better video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto G5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.