Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-31 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than the Moto G5 Plus, having a score of 88.3 against 74.6. Although Galaxy S10 is just a little bit heavier than Moto G5 Plus, it's thinner and also newer. The Galaxy S10 counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040, a better pixels density and a larger screen. Galaxy S10 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 12 mega pixels back-facing camera, the Galaxy S10 also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit superior battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10 costs more money than the Moto G5 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.