Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is way better than Moto G5 Plus, with an 89.7 score against 74.6. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Moto G5 Plus's, but it is somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a screen that is very similar to Motorola Moto G5 Plus's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little lower display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite takes greater photos and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better battery life than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S10 Lite costs more money than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.