Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than Moto G5 Plus's score of 74.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Moto G5 Plus. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better screen than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE takes much better videos and photos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a 12 megapixels, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.