Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus's global score of 74.6. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus's, but it is also heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better screen than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit better pixels density and a way bigger display. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with slightly more memory to install applications and games than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Moto G5 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.