Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-31 | -- |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is much better than the Moto G5 Plus, with a overall score of 82.6 against 74.6. Samsung Galaxy S25's construction is incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto G5 Plus. The Moto G5 Plus features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a more vivid screen than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy S25 takes greater photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs, a way higher video resolution and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy S25 has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S25 has improved battery lifetime than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.