Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-31 | -- |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is way better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus's 74.6 overall score. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter device than Motorola Moto G5 Plus. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a lot larger screen, a bit higher screen density and a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Motorola Moto G5 Plus has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way more mega-pixels back camera, a much larger sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.