Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Moto G5 Plus, getting an 80.1 score against 74.6. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is incredibly newer than the Moto G5 Plus's, but it is noticeably heavier and notably thicker. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater number of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto G5 Plus captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Motorola Moto G5 Plus also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much longer battery performance than Moto G5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G5 Plus. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G5 Plus, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.