Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than the Moto G5 Plus's global score of 74.6. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat heavier than the Moto G5 Plus, it's incredibly thinner and also way newer. The Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a quite better pixel density.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos and a tinier aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with higher video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit longer battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G5 Plus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G5 Plus, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.