Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, getting a score of 92.3 against 74.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way newer and way thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but it's somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better performance than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a little better screen pixels density, a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations and a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with better video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit longer battery life than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Moto G5 Plus, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.