Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Moto G5 Plus's 74.6 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner than Moto G5 Plus's, although it's much heavier. Moto G5 Plus has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs more money than the Moto G5 Plus, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.