Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-26 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than Motorola Moto G50, having a score of 83.8 against 75.3. Galaxy A50's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G50, even though it was released 2 years before. The Galaxy A50 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A50 features a bit faster CPU than Moto G50. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A50 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G50, although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, they both have the same diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit more storage for applications and games than Moto G50, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G50 has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.