Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-26 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto G50's 75.3 score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50s is older than Motorola Moto G50, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto G50 has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A50s has a more vivid screen than Moto G50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50s takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto G50, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have a 48 mega pixels back facing camera. The Galaxy A50s has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G50, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G50 has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.