Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-26 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than Moto G50, with an 85.5 score against 75.3. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide the same operating system features. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 is older than Moto G50, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The Galaxy A51 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G50. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A51 has a more vivid display than Moto G50, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A51 also has a better pixel amount in each inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 captures greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G50, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, they both have the same resolution camera. Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G50, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola Moto G50 has longer battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.