Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-26 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G50's 75.3 score. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Moto G50 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is a bit heavier but a bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G50, and they were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than Moto G50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Moto G50, because it has a much better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G50, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G50 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Moto G50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.