Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-26 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than Moto G50, getting an 81.2 score against 75.3. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Moto G50 has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note 3 is noticeably older than the Moto G50, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a way better screen than Motorola Moto G50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Motorola Moto G50 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G50 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little better performance than Moto G50, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Motorola Moto G50 has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 3 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G50, although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture and a camera with a much lower 13 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.