Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-26 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G50, with a 79.3 score against 75.3. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while Motorola Moto G50 has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's construction is lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G50, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot better screen density. Moto G50 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G50 also has a larger number of cores (although slower).
The Moto G50 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G50 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better camera than Moto G50, although it has a way worse 16 megapixels resolution back camera and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images in low light situations.
Motorola Moto G50 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.