Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-26 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Moto G50's 75.3 score. Although the Galaxy Note5 is much older than the Moto G50, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy Note5 features a bit faster processor than Moto G50. Both of them have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a much better looking display than Moto G50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot higher pixel number per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note5 features a bit better camera than Moto G50, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back camera and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video.
Moto G50 features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G50 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G50 features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.