Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-26 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Moto G50, with a 93.6 score against 75.3. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is somewhat thinner than the Moto G50, although it's a little bit heavier and was released many years before. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give all the same operating system features.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much more vibrant screen than Moto G50, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a lot greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better camera than Moto G50, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments. Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G50, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Moto G50 has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.