Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than Motorola Moto G50, with a 94.8 score against 75.3. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than the Motorola Moto G50, it's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Motorola Moto G50 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 has a way better display than Motorola Moto G50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G50, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 takes much better photographs and videos than Moto G50, although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos.
The Moto G50 features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.