Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-26 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than Moto G50's 75.3 general score. Galaxy S20 FE is a just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner phone than Moto G50, even though they were released with only 7 months difference. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a more vivid display than Moto G50, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher pixel amount in each display inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a superior camera than Moto G50, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G50, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Moto G50 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.