Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-26 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a bit better than the Moto G50, having a overall score of 79.5 against 75.3. The Galaxy S7 is an extremely older device than Moto G50, but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking display than Moto G50, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much higher screen density.
The Motorola Moto G50 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G50 features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G50 also has 4 more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G50, although it has a way less mega-pixels camera, they both have a same size aperture. The Moto G50 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.