Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Moto G51 5G's overall score of 77.8. The Google Pixel 3 body is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Google Pixel 3 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display density.
The Moto G51 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G51 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G51 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
Moto G51 5G takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Moto G51 5G also has better 240 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with a lot higher resolution. The Motorola Moto G51 5G features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.