Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, getting a global score of 83.8 against 77.8. Although the Galaxy A50 is a lot older than Motorola Moto G51 5G, it's construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G51 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better looking display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Moto G51 5G has a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G51 5G also counts with higher video frame rates and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.