Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto G51 5G's 77.8 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A50s is an notably older cellphone than the Moto G51 5G, but Samsung was able to build it notably lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little sharper display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a little better performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has much more memory for apps and games than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a lesser megapixels back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.