Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is slightly better than Moto G51 5G's global score of 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is an notably older phone than Moto G51 5G, but Samsung made it thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) and Moto G51 5G feature quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixels density. Moto G51 5G shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G51 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera and better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 128 GB internal storage. Moto G51 5G counts with better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.