Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-12-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Moto G51 5G's global score of 77.8. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Fold is much older and a lot heavier than Moto G51 5G, it's design is still a lot thinner. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Moto G51 5G has Android 11.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit superior processor than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Galaxy Fold counts with a display that is very similar to Moto G51 5G's screen, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a little inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto G51 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also counts with higher 240 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G features a little better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.