Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, with a 90.8 score against 77.8. Although Galaxy Note 20 is older than Motorola Moto G51 5G, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Moto G51 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Moto G51 5G also has higher video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G51 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.