Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola Moto G51 5G's 77.8 general score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11, giving a couple additional features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, but both weight 7.34oz.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite larger screen and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage to store more apps and games than Moto G51 5G, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G51 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.