Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Moto G51 5G, having a score of 81.2 against 77.8. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much older than Moto G51 5G, it's design is a little bit thinner and lighter.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit smaller display and a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G51 5G counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G51 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processing unit than Moto G51 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Moto G51 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G51 5G also has faster 240 fps video frame rates, a camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Moto G51 5G features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.