Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, getting a general score of 79.3 against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an much older cellphone than Motorola Moto G51 5G, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version and Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola Moto G51 5G has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a greater number of cores (although they are slower).
Motorola Moto G51 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments, faster video frame rate and a much more mega pixels camera.
Motorola Moto G51 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G51 5G has a superior battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.